Archive for the ‘racism’ Category

Racist McCain accuses Obama of racism

Saturday, August 2nd, 2008

Let me get this straight.  If Obama mentions that he is opposed by racists, that is “playing the race card” and out of bounds?  Doubletalk.  Obama is opposed by racists, and John McCain himself is a racist.  That doesn’t make Obama the perfect candidate, even among those of us who think racism needs to be a major issue in the campaign, but it does need saying and it needs to be said often and with heads held high.  Let the racists scurry for cover when the subject comes up; they will be running on their records.

Dropping the G-bomb on McCain

Monday, June 23rd, 2008

I’m no fan of the Democratic Party, especially this month, but an enterprising liberal blogger has come up with a scheme to Google bomb John McCain, and I’ll help in whatever small way I can.

If you’re not familiar with the term, Google bombing is a way to increase the ranking of particular web pages in the Google search results, by linking to those pages. It would be nice if people searching for information on John McCain came up with the articles that describe how John McCain voted to filibuster a minimum wage hike, how John McCain said it would be “fine” to keep the troops in Iraq for a hundred years, how John McCain said Bush was right to veto health care funding for poor children…you get the idea.

Nine articles are part of the project. I can’t figure out why McCain’s admitted use of the word “gook” wasn’t one of them. I think he’d lose a vote or two if one of the top ten Google searches for “McCain” pointed to his recent use of the racist epithet. This wasn’t just during his time as a POW, no, he said “gook” right out during a conversation with reporters, on his campaign bus, in 2000. “I hated the gooks,” said McCain. “I will hate them as long as I live.” Sounds like straight talk to me, much more believable than the apology that followed some days later.

With fifty men we could subjugate them all….

Monday, October 10th, 2005

They… brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks’ bells. They willingly traded everything they owned…. They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features…. They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of cane…. They would make fine servants…. With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.

These are the words of Christopher Columbus, who is still generally considered to be a hero, and discoverer of America. Today he is honored with an official holiday in the United States. The people he describes in the passage above were the Arawaks, who are now extinct: murdered outright, worked to death as slaves, or killed working in Spanish gold mines. Historian Howard Zinn describes the decidedly un-heroic details:

The chief source-and, on many matters the only source of information about what happened on the islands after Columbus came is Bartolome de las Casas, who, as a young priest, participated in the conquest of Cuba. For a time he owned a plantation on which Indian slaves worked, but he gave that up and became a vehement critic of Spanish cruelty. In Book Two of his History of the Indies, Las Casas (who at first urged replacing Indians by black slaves, thinking they were stronger and would survive, but later relented when he saw the effects on blacks) tells about the treatment of the Indians by the Spaniards. It is a unique account and deserves to be quoted at length:

“Endless testimonies . . . prove the mild and pacific temperament of the natives…. But our work was to exasperate, ravage, kill, mangle and destroy; small wonder, then, if they tried to kill one of us now and then…. The admiral, it is true, was blind as those who came after him, and he was so anxious to please the King that he committed irreparable crimes against the Indians…”

Las Casas tells how the Spaniards “grew more conceited every day” and after a while refused to walk any distance. They “rode the backs of Indians if they were in a hurry” or were carried on hammocks by Indians running in relays. “In this case they also had Indians carry large leaves to shade them from the sun and others to fan them with goose wings.”

Total control led to total cruelty. The Spaniards “thought nothing of knifing Indians by tens and twenties and of cutting slices off them to test the sharpness of their blades.” Las Casas tells how “two of these so-called Christians met two Indian boys one day, each carrying a parrot; they took the parrots and for fun beheaded the boys.”

The Indians’ attempts to defend themselves failed. And when they ran off into the hills they were found and killed. So, Las Casas reports. “they suffered and died in the mines and other labors in desperate silence, knowing not a soul in the world to whom they could tun for help.” He describes their work in the mines:

“… mountains are stripped from top to bottom and bottom to top a thousand times; they dig, split rocks, move stones, and carry dirt on their backs to wash it in the rivers, while those who wash gold stay in the water all the time with their backs bent so constantly it breaks them; and when water invades the mines, the most arduous task of all is to dry the mines by scooping up pansful of water and throwing it up outside….

After each six or eight months’ work in the mines, which was the time required of each crew to dig enough gold for melting, up to a third of the men died. While the men were sent many miles away to the mines, the wives remained to work the soil, forced into the excruciating job of digging and making thousands of hills for cassava plants.

Thus husbands and wives were together only once every eight or ten months and when they met they were so exhausted and depressed on both sides . . . they ceased to procreate. As for the newly born, they died early because their mothers, overworked and famished, had no milk to nurse them, and for this reason, while I was in Cuba, 7000 children died in three months. Some mothers even drowned their babies from sheer desperation…. In this way, husbands died in the mines, wives died at work, and children died from lack of milk . . . and in a short time this land which was so great, so powerful and fertile … was depopulated…. My eyes have seen these acts so foreign to human nature, and now I tremble as I write….”

When he arrived on Hispaniola in 1508, Las Casas says, “there were 60,000 people living on this island, including the Indians; so that from 1494 to 1508, over three million people had perished from war, slavery, and the mines. Who in future generations will believe this? I myself writing it as a knowledgeable eyewitness can hardly believe it….”

Another Republican racist can’t keep mouth shut

Friday, April 11th, 2003

This time it’s Rep. Barbara Cubin, R-Wyoming, who managed to suggest, on the floor of the House of Representatives, that all blacks use drugs. Then Republicans managed on a largely party-line vote to stand behind her on a vote about whether to strike her racist comment for the record.

Cubin apologized in the traditional, insincere manner of racists who got caught: she is sorry “if” she offended the “sensitivities” of her listeners.

Those who were paying attention in December, just four short months ago, will recall that after Trent Lott made racist remarks, the Republicans fell all over themselves to say that Republicans were not racists. I’ve tried in vain to find any news reports of Trent Lott commenting on the Cubin fiasco, but found only a great and eloquent silence.

How to make enemies

Friday, February 21st, 2003

NPR reported February 8 that large numbers of Pakistanis are leaving the U.S. for Canada, fearing anti-Arab repression and seeking asylum. The Canadian government, to their shame, is sending them back. This results in refugees being delivered into the hands of the very government they were fleeing, and hundreds have been detained.

Same as it ever was

Thursday, January 16th, 2003

align=right alt=”confederate flag”> Just in case you thought the Republican Party had really thrown off its old racist baggage, I note that Bush administration will intervene today against the University of Michigan’s affirmative action policy. While Dubya claims to be against segregation in higher education, he is steadfastly against any measures that would actually be effective in getting rid of it.

I predict that Trent Lott, who recently declared his strong support for affirmative action, will take this opportunity to be very, very quiet.

Trent, we hardly knew ye

Wednesday, December 18th, 2002

Trent Lott is a racist. Who knew?

If Lott’s desperate and hilarious campaign to apologize is successful, he will have convinced his fellow Republican senators that he’s just a good old boy who got out of hand, and has learned his lesson, and will be good from now on. Indeed he is suddenly in favor of affirmative action, unlike the conservative judges he and his colleagues have appointed. And he’s decided he would approve of the Martin Luther King Jr. federal holiday, if only it were on the Senate’s agenda.

Lott wants us to believe that he got a bum rap, because he’s not a segregationist. But that’s just a straw man. Nobody thinks Lott wants to turn back the clock on desegregation. What Lott’s opponents object to is the fact that Trent Lott is a racist, a well-known racist, who got elected by appealing to racist white voters. Far from being outside the mainstream of the Republican Party, being a racist puts him firmly at the center of it. He is the poster child for the Southern Strategy that has brought the Republicans to the White House. Lott gives the lie to the George W. Bush party line that racism is a thing of the past. No wonder Dubya is letting him twist.

So what should be his punishment? Lott thinks having to apologize on BET is all the punishment he deserves. Demoting him from his position as one of the most powerful men on the planet seems like a good start. Though I actually hope he’ll stay on as Senate majority leader. I haven’t had this much fun since Newt Gingrich.

Ix-nay on the Usade-cray

Friday, August 9th, 2002

The official Washington line is that we aren’t bigots. The fact that Muslims all over the world are on the wrong end of U.S. guns is coincidence, we are asked to believe, and has nothing to do with anti-Islamic bigotry.

Enter Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly, apparently not a team player, who says that making college students read a book about Islam is comparable to teaching Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” in 1941. He questions the purpose of having students study “our enemy’s religion”.

He is joined by Rev. Franklin Graham, son of and designated successor to the famous Billy Graham, who calls Islam as a whole “wicked and violent.”

“Do you have blacks, too?”

Thursday, June 6th, 2002

This racist gaffe by George W. Bush is hard to believe, but is in fact documented in Der Spiegel: the President, during a meeting with the Brazilian president on April 28, 2002, interrupted him to ask: “Do you have blacks, too?” Condoleezza Rice came to his rescue before he could embarrass himself further.

I can’t vouch for this English translation of the original German.